
Coaches Bruce Read and Joe Seumalo are trying to get the most of the players. PHOTO/Scobel Wiggins
How the Oregon State football team practices came under scrutiny this week since the Beavers have not been ready to play the last two games.
Washington State dominated the Beavers from start to finish last weekend. During the UCLA game the week before there was a general lackluster effort.
“I feel we came out flat,” QB Ryan Katz said. “At times I felt we came out flat this season. We have to find a way to change that. Someone has to step up. We have to make more plays.”
This ongoing problem was something coach Mike Riley wondered about this week. That’s why the coaches reviewed what they are doing in practice.
“As much as anything it’s the approach to the detail to practice,” Riley said. “And then making it come alive in the game. Is it transferring to the game? Are we doing a good enough job coaching the details? Are we helping them to have the mental edge to play physically? Are we demanding enough of what’s expected?”
Read my main story in Wednesday’s GT where Riley defends what the staff is doing. It was addressed in my previous blog, but this has more details.
“I have a great group of coaches who are hard-working and very detailed,” Riley said. “All we are doing is asking the rhetorical questions of what’s missing here. What we have to continue is emphasis of the detail. That commitment is not only metal, but physical detail. There’s a progression to ready you to play on Saturday.”
Here’s a link to the notebook that has similar themes such as lack of depth on both lines, injury issues and other items.
“We’ve been there,” Riley said of being successful. “We’ve won a lot of games, and know the particulars to get to the football game. We have to reconfirm those things to our team. We are not at that edge. We are not playing well as we should. So we have to reconfirm those things that are important to the team’s past.”
Other parts of practice is how it’s put together. Are the players being prepared for the games by the coaches?
They usually are under Riley. And he’s not doing anything different. But should he?
“I thought about practice a lot during the years,” Riley said. “There are so many things you have to do in the week of preparation. There’s so many situations you have to cover. Those kinds of things are hard to change. We have practiced with a routine with those parts for eight years. Things have changed from time to time. We study that in the offseason. My contention is there’s a perfect way to practice and we are not there yet, but we keep searching for it. We tweak stuff all the time, but there are elements that don’t change. There are parts you have to go through and will always be included.”
Finally, there’s the intensity of practice. Riley’s not a yeller, but the defensive coaches are. So is offensive line coach Mike Cavanaugh and offensive coordinator Danny Langsdorf.
Riley has bee criticized over the years for not being intense enough or hard enough on the players.
“I really contend personality has nothing to do with preparation for football,” Riley said. “Being yourself is the way to go. That has nothing to do with being demanding or disciple. It always comes out if we win it’s my personality. When we lose it’s my personality. None of it means anything to me. I just coach.”
After all the preparation the coaches do, the players must put in the work on the field. Riley treats them like adults that they are, and expect them to strive to be the best.
“The players have to have the pride to have those details in the game,” Riley said. “If they are committed enough and ready enough, they play a good football game.”
So are the players getting what they need from practice?
“I felt pretty good after this last week,” Katz said. “The tempo was good. We just have to play faster in practice. We have to play harder in practice. That translates into the game.”

Mark Banker, Mike Riley and Reggie Davis hopes to inspire the players. PHOTO/Scobel Wiggins.

8 comments
beaverteeth says:
May 18, 2012
First of all this team has lost 200 yards of offense per game in losing James.
Second this team is not as good even with James then it was last year.
Third Riley needs to to reinvent his offense it is way to predictable I see teams knowing exactly where the ball is going. BYU new every play Riley was going to run the same with WSU and others. Predictability….I do not understand why it takes Quarterbacks so long to learn the offensive system at OSU when opposing teams seem to understand where the ball is going all the time? Then there is defense that is another issue for another day.
wcjr says:
May 18, 2012
Totally agree. Seems this is Mr. Thomas's first year running a much more complex offense(take note Danny and Mike) down in Eugene. How's that workin' out for him? BTW, even Steve P. questioned at least one call in the WSU game as I watched part of the reply. Exact quote: "I don't understand that call."
ean says:
May 18, 2012
Actually UofO's offense is quite a bit simpler. Maybe we need to simplify things?
GoBeavs64 says:
May 18, 2012
I think your right , I believe we might have all the right coaches and I hope that Mike is trying to keep up with the Jones' but if he isn't and the assistant coaches are not , then before long we can look forward to the glory days of the 70s , 80s and 90s. When opposing teams consistently shut you down when your running your best stuff , stuff that you run redundantly then it's time for change . Hopefully it's just in the way you conduct practice and the schemes you run but if the coaching staff is too set in it's ways to keep of with the rest of the NCAA , then changes need to be made there too. Next year the Pac Ten becomes the Pac 12 and we play teams we are not used to , teams like Colorado and Utah , If we can play with those kinds of teams without changing our look big time that will be a major miracle .
beaverteeth says:
May 18, 2012
It is called being out coached and this happens allot. Good teams make adjustments during games and I just do not see that happening enough in these games.
Jayson_L says:
May 18, 2012
Cliff,
Great read, thanks. Seems a bit like Mike is trying to remind people that we have had success over the years. Sure the team seems down but that does not mean they don't have the chance to rock the PAC-10 race or even the BCS.
The next few games need to be more than a scrimmage to get the young guys playing time. This team needs to show the fire that a TEAM should have.
ean says:
May 18, 2012
I agree Mike has had success in the past. But just because something has worked in the past doesn't mean it will work in the future. I am not saying to blow it up just saying you have to always be looking for ways to improve because everyone else is. I think Riley has done this and will continue to do this though.
osbeavs says:
May 18, 2012
I definitely think that the defense we run doesn't work. It seems that Riley has a lot of faith in his coaches, it doesn't mean we have to. Riley is blinded by his loyalty to Banker, he doesn't see that this defense has been on a steep decline since the end of 2008. Also, it seems that some of the fan base is giving Riley a pass now. The idea seems to be, "well Coach is working hard, it's just the players fault." Anytime the players aren't executing look to the coaches. It is the coaches job to get everyone ready to play, physically and mentally. Also, it is their job to evaluate talent and recruit guys who can play the game.