The Pacific-12 Conference announced its official breakdown for football Thursday. For the full story with OSU reaction, read my Friday story. Here’s the basics of the new conference that begins July 1, 2011.
Pac-12 North: Oregon State, Oregon, Washington, Washington State, California, Stanford.
Pac-12 South: USC, UCLA, Arizona, Arizona State, Utah, Colorado.
There will be nine conference games, five vs. division opponents. The other four will rotate. The only thing is the NorCal and SoCal schools play every year. That means the Northwest schools play an L.A. school once every other year.
OSU AD Bob De Carolis was not in favor of this, and voted against it early. However, his many goal was equal revenue sharing. And he got it.
“With the zipper plan on the table we changed the revenue sharing to be equal,” De Carolis said. “That mitigated the other things.”
Revenue sharing will be equal in the 2012-13 year when the TV deal reworked. That way USC and UCLA gets extra money until then.
As for the recruiting issue of not being in L.A. annually, De Carolis said it’s not as big of deal as it was in the 1970s and 80s. Video technology allows coaches to see players and athletes can still play in their home area every other year.
The championship game will be at site of No. 1 seed. If tied, there will be a tie breaker – head-to-head and possibly the BCS standings down the road.
“I thing it’s great,” De Carolis said. “You want a festive atmosphere. You want to sell out the stadium. It’s just a nightmare for the schools. We have to figure out. You have to reseat the stadium. It will be like a now game with sponsors taking up the best seats.”
Basketball has 18-game schedule. The rivals play a home-and-away schedule annually. There will be six rotating home-and-way games with four rotating single-games with the other four teams.

17 comments
purple_orange says:
May 18, 2012
Cliff, looking down the road, will the new money translate into upgrading Reser? Meaning the west side of course.
ckirkpatrick says:
May 18, 2012
No. OSU runs $4 million behind each year. The plan is to get the academic budget even after the added revenue comes in from the new TV contract.
Expanding facilities come from fundraising.
angrybeaver says:
May 18, 2012
I like it. I thought the TV deal is due this year, though?
http://angrybeavs.com
ckirkpatrick says:
May 18, 2012
The TV deal has one more year to go.
SanDiegoBeav says:
May 18, 2012
Are there any plans in place to start a new fundraising campaign for the west side of Reser? As nice as the east side looks, we still play in a half finished stadium. I know I would contribute something to the fundraising effort if I knew a plan was in the works.
ckirkpatrick says:
May 18, 2012
Not at the moment.
AndySnacks says:
May 18, 2012
I'm not sure I get how this is such a bad thing for Oregon and Washington schools. It seems to me that by reducing the amount of games they will play against SC and UCLA, two schools that have historically been good in football, this would allow for an easier path to the Pac-10 championship game, as Stanford and Cal will be guaranteed games with those two schools every year, in effect giving a competitive advantage on the field to the NW schools. Part of the draw of playing the LA schools was the TV $$$$, but if the money is split equally, OSU and Washington State will benefit from a nationally televised Stanford/USC matchup just the same as if they were playing in it. The only drawback would be in the perceived recruiting disadvantage of not playing in LA, but you know what helps recruiting more than location? Winning. Ask Boise State.
tradernum1 says:
May 18, 2012
It is absolutely pathetic, and a testament to the weakness of the commissioner
and our athletic director.
The emphasis on "global" branding is moronic and is code for "I want to talk like a ceo, but I don't actually know anything". Anybody think that the Chinese give a crap? Europe? Fiji?
The correct model is the SEC, and this bunch of nitwits blew it.
GoBeavs64 says:
May 18, 2012
I am wondering and I have yet to see anything mentioned here about it , how will this affect the Civil War ? I am assuming it will still take place every year . If so , at what point during the season ? Will it still take place at the end of the season or earlier ? I notice in other conferences , the SEC for instance , that interstate rivals sometimes play each other no more than 4 weeks into the conference season.
Cliff , any answers to this ?
ckirkpatrick says:
May 18, 2012
Civil War will be every year and be the last regular season game of the year. That's why the zipper didn't go. Pac-12 didn't want the Civil War to happen and then have a rematch in the Pac-12 title game the next week.
GoBeavs64 says:
May 18, 2012
I am wondering and I have yet to see anything mentioned here about it , how will this affect the Civil War ? I am assuming it will still take place every year . If so , at what point during the season ? Will it still take place at the end of the season or earlier ? I notice in other conferences , the SEC for instance , that interstate rivals sometimes play each other no more than 4 weeks into the conference season.
osbeavs says:
May 18, 2012
I am not sure I get your math, there are two LA schools. Cumulatively they will have 4 games that they can play against the NW schools each year. That means every year we can play either USC or UCLA. That also means that of those contests, every other one will be home thus the other one is away.
jefframp says:
May 18, 2012
Fuzzy math I guess. Where is the edit button when you need it? I was sure I had this all figured out too.
My bad!
aaron_ says:
May 18, 2012
We got equal revenue and that is huge. We still have the Bay Area for recruiting and still get trips to LA every other year. This is all do-able stuff.
In addition to this we will have an easier path to the Conference Title game. The south seems to have a tougher grouping. Once Luck and Harbaugh leave for the NFL the the Cardinal will be back to their normal ways. The only one in our way will be the Quacks.
WebTraveler says:
May 18, 2012
So USC, UCLA and Cal, Stanford play each other every year. How does that balance out for the Beavers and Ducks? Do they get two opponents they play every year? Seems as if this creates an imbalance somewhere.
Better get that series with San Diego State continued into the future!!!!
aaron_ says:
May 18, 2012
thats fine let the Cali schools beat each other up. Better for the Beavs!
tradernum1 says:
May 18, 2012
Whether we agree or disagree, it's time for us to get behind our football team.
Let's go beavs.